SFO International Council - Weekly edition
Volume: 7 - N. 01 - 2001 - January - I
From: http://Vatican.va
1 JANUARY 2001
(Part I)
1. At the dawn of a new millennium, there is growing hope that relationships between people will be increasingly inspired by the ideal of a truly universal brotherhood. Unless this ideal is shared, there will be no way to ensure a stable peace. There are many signs which suggest that this conviction is becoming more deeply rooted in people's minds. The importance of fraternity is proclaimed in the great "charters" of human rights; it is embodied in great international institutions, particularly the United Nations; and it is called for, as never before, by the process of globalization which is leading to a progressive unification of the economy, culture and society. For their part, the followers of the different religions are ever more conscious of the fact that a relationship with the one God, the common Father of all, cannot fail to bring about a greater sense of human brotherhood and a more fraternal life together. In God's revelation in Christ, this principle finds a radical expression: "He who does not love does not know God; for God is love" (1 Jn 4:8).
2. At the same time, however, it cannot be denied that thick clouds overshadowthese bright hopes. Humanity is beginning this new chapter of its history withstill open wounds. In many regions it is beset by bitter and bloody conflicts,and is struggling with increasing difficulty to maintain solidarity betweenpeople of different cultures and civilizations living together in the sameterritory. We all know how hard it is to settle differences between parties whenancient hatreds and serious problems which admit of no easy solution create anatmosphere of anger and exasperation. But no less dangerous for the future ofpeace would be the inability to confront intelligently the problems posed by anew social configuration resulting in many countries from accelerated migrationand the unprecedented situation of people of different cultures andcivilizations living side by side.
3. I therefore consider it urgent to invite believers in Christ, together withall men and women of good will, to reflect on the theme of dialogue betweencultures and traditions. This dialogue is the obligatory path to thebuilding of a reconciled world, a world able to look with serenity to its ownfuture. This is a theme which is crucial to the pursuit of peace. I am pleasedthat the United Nations Organization has called attention to this urgent need bydeclaring 2001 the "International Year of Dialogue AmongCivilizations".
Naturally, I do not believe that there can be easy or readily applicablesolutions to a problem like this. It is difficult enough to undertake ananalysis of the situation, which is in constant flux and defies all preconceivedmodels. There is also the difficulty of combining principles and values which,however reconcilable in the abstract, can prove on the practical level to beresistant to any easy synthesis. In addition, at a deeper level, there arealways the demands which ethical commitment makes upon individuals, who are notfree of self-interest and human limitations.
But for this very reason I see the usefulness of a shared reflection on theseissues. With this intention I confine myself here to offering some guidelines,listening to what the Spirit of God is saying to the Churches (cf. Rev 2:7)and to all of humanity at this decisive hour of its history.
4. Reflecting upon the human situation, one is always amazed at the complexity and diversity of human cultures. Each of them is distinct by virtue of its specific historical evolution and the resulting characteristics which make it a structurally unique, original and organic whole. Culture is the form of man's self-expression in his journey through history, on the level of both individuals and social groups. For man is driven incessantly by his intellect and will to "cultivate natural goods and values",(1) to incorporate in an ever higher and more systematic cultural synthesis his basic knowledge of all aspects of life, particularly those involving social and political life, security and economic development, and to foster those existential values and perspectives, especially in the religious sphere, which enable individual and community life to develop in a way that is authentically human.(2)
5. A culture is always marked by stable and enduring elements, as well as by changing and contingent features. At first glance, in examining a culture we are struck above all by those aspects which distinguish it from our own culture; these give each culture a face of its own, as an amalgam of quite distinctive elements. In most cases, a culture develops in a specific place, where geographical, historical and ethnic elements combine in an original and unique way. The "uniqueness" of each culture is reflected more or less clearly in those individuals who are its bearers, in a constant process whereby individuals are influenced by their culture and then, according to their different abilities and genius, contribute to it something of their own. In any event, a person necessarily lives within a specific culture. People are marked by the culture whose very air they breathe through the family and the social groups around them, through education and the most varied influences of their environment, through the very relationship which they have with the place in which they live. There is no determinism here, but rather a constant dialectic between the strength of the individual's conditioning and the workings of human freedom.
6. The need to accept one's own culture as a structuring element of one's personality, especially in the initial stages of life, is a fact of universal experience whose importance can hardly be overestimated. Without a firm rooting in a specific "soil", individuals risk being subjected at a still vulnerable age to an excess of conflicting stimuli which could impair their serene and balanced development. It is on the basis of this essential relationship with one's own "origins" - on the level of the family, but also of territory, society and culture - that people acquire a sense of their nationality, and culture tends to take on, to a greater or lesser degree in different places, a "national" configuration. The Son of God himself, by becoming man, acquired, along with a human family, a country. He remains for ever Jesus of Nazareth, the Nazarean (cf. Mk 10:47; Lk 18:37; Jn 1:45; 19:19). This is a natural process, in which sociological and psychological forces interact, with results that are normally positive and constructive. Love for one's country is thus a value to be fostered, without narrow-mindedness but with love for the whole human family(3) and with an effort to avoid those pathological manifestations which occur when the sense of belonging turns into selfexaltation, the rejection of diversity, and forms of nationalism, racism and xenophobia.
7. Consequently, while it is certainly important to be able to appreciate the values of one's own culture, there is also a need to recognize that every culture, as a typically human and historically conditioned reality, necessarily has its limitations. In order to prevent the sense of belonging to one particular culture from turning into isolation, an effective antidote is a serene and unprejudiced knowledge of other cultures. Moreover, when cultures are carefully and rigorously studied, they very often reveal beneath their outward variations significant common elements. This can also be seen in the historical sequence of cultures and civilizations. The Church, looking to Christ, who reveals man to himself,(4) and drawing upon her experience of two thousand years of history, is convinced that "beneath all that changes, there is much that is unchanging".(5) This continuity is based upon the essential and universal character of God's plan for humanity.
Cultural diversity should therefore be understood within the broader horizonof the unity of the human race. In a real way, this unity constitutes theprimordial historical and ontological datum in the light of which the profoundmeaning of cultural diversity can be grasped. In fact, only an overall vision ofboth the elements of unity and the elements of diversity makes it possible tounderstand and interpret the full truth of every human culture.(6)
Notes:
(1) Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Pastoral Constitution on the Church inthe Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 53.
(2) Cf. John Paul II, Address to the United Nations (15 October 1995).
(3) Cf. Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Pastoral Constitution on the Churchin the Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 75.
(4) Cf. ibid., 22.
(5) Ibid., 10.
(6) John Paul II, Address to UNESCO (2 June 1980), No. 6.